Din jurnalul unui pictor naiv, Timişoara, Marineasa, 1999 (fiction register). Search in Google ScholarĬristea, Viorel, Totu-i în floare, şi el a fost la fel. Search in Google ScholarĬrăciun, Gheorghe, Introducere în teoria literaturii, București, Magister, 1998 (academic register). * Cotidianul – Romanian newspaper (August 2002) (journalistic register – electronic format). * Adevărul – Romanian newspaper (March 1999 – October 2002) (journalistic register – electronic format). Search in Google Scholar 6.2 Written Romanian corpus Pop, Liana/Duma, Melania/Pașcalău, Cristian (ed.), Façon de parler.ro, Cluj, Echinox, 2011. Recherches sur les forums des jeunes (corpus of internet discussions in three languages), Cluj, Echinox, 2008. Schiţă de tipologie, București, Editura Universităţii din București, 2002. Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana (ed.), Interacţiunea verbală în limba română actuală. Eșantioane, București, Oscar Print, 2002. The corpus analysis will focus on the particular contexts in which the middle reading is triggered: i) the adverbial modification ii) the modal/procedural interpretation of the event iii) the responsibility of the subject iv) the arbitrary interpretation of the implicit argument which follows from the generic interpretation (Steinbach 2002).Ħ Bibliography 6.1 Spoken Romanian corporaĭascălu Jinga, Laurenția, Corpus de română vorbită (CORV). Starting from Grahek’s definition (2008, 44), in this paper, middles are a heterogeneous class of constructions that share formal properties of both active and passive structures: on the one hand, they have active verb forms, but, on the other hand, like passives, they have understood subjects and normally display promoted objects.
![romanian ebooks carti in limba romana romanian ebooks carti in limba romana](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/21ZXUBBV47L._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)
Since Jespersen (1927), middles were attested cross-linguistically, and the focus on middles is justified if we consider the fact that this is an interesting testing ground for theories of syntax, semantics and their interaction (Fagan 1992). The present paper aims to present an inventory of Romanian middle contructions ( se‑verbal constructions), and to extend the analysis to other structures (with or without se) that were not previously investigated, but exhibit the same characteristics, and seem to allow middle reading ( adjunct middles).